Below you'll find a list of all posts that have been categorized as “Not the Monthly Planet!”
June 2011 I was just reading a blog post (in Dutch) by my friend and colleague Liz Hathway. She analysed the chart of the time that the first E-Coli victim in Germany reported sick. Knowing Liz she has done her research into how that time was found! I agree with her – it is a good example of the fight between those two …
May 2011 A few years ago when I was doing my dissertation for my MA in Cultural Astronomy and Astrology, I was lucky enough to get an interview with one of the managers at Athos, the managing company of C&A in Amsterdam. This week in the press, there was an article about them, confirming what I had discovered then. They had …
May 2011 I have written a few times about the fact that Neptune is in the middle of going backwards and forwards changing sign from Aquarius to Pisces. I talked about us developing a new dream. Here’s what I wrote in the Capricorn 2011 post. “Although we will continue to experience the power of all this technology and experience sudden new …
April 2011 This is what I wrote at the beginning of the year in my Capricorn post this year. “… Neptune changes sign as well. Going for a trial run in Pisces between April until August 2011,he enters fully into Pisces in 2012. He has been in Aquarius since 1998 which has resulted in there being no borders and boundaries when …
December 2010 “Astrology is Total Bollocks” This week, Dr. Brian Cox delivered the Huw Wheldon Memorial lecture on ‘Science: a Challenge to TV orthodoxy.’ “Astrology is total bollocks” is what he said – having yet another dig at astrology and astrologers or astrologists as he incorrectly calls us. Now I like a good challenge and I don’t have a problem …
November 2010 Thank goodness. In Pluto’s time of the year, Scorpio – when else – science has proved that he is still the biggest known body in the Kuiper Belt. Part of his reclassification to a Dwarf-planet in 2006 was due to the fact that there were many other objects out there and he was possibly smaller than the then recently discovered …